Varonis unveils cloud-native solution for database security Varonis launches a cloud-native, agentless database activity monitoring solution to enhance security and simplify compliance across major database platforms. 
© 2025 ITBrief 2:15am This Asus OLED gaming laptop with RTX 5060 is insane for $400 off Has your mouth been watering for an RTX 50-series laptop but you can’t justify the exorbitant prices? Well, here’s a sizzling chance that may or may not come around again for a while: Best Buy is selling this Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 for $1,400 right now, a whopping $400 off its original $1,800 MSRP and a fantastic price for the hardware inside.
Let’s start with the hottest component: a GeForce RTX 5060 that’s capable of Nvidia’s latest DLSS 4 and ray tracing technologies, with gains over last-gen RTX 40-series laptops. It’s ideal for high-frame-rate 1080p gaming, but can even push 1440p with the right settings in some games. You’ll love those high frame rates on this laptop’s gorgeous 14-inch OLED display with its roomy 2880×1800 resolution and fast 120Hz refresh rate.
This config isn’t lacking in other departments, either. It comes with a cutting-edge AMD Ryzen 9 270 processor and 16GB of speedy LPDDR5X RAM, plus a 1TB PCIe 4.0 SSD. That’s more than enough power to handle Windows 11 and all your apps with smooth responsiveness. The ports are pretty good here, too, with access to HDMI, USB-C 4, USB-C 3.2, and dual USB-A 3.2, plus the latest Wi-Fi 7 standard.
Whether you’re churning through spreadsheets, binge-watching Netflix, or grinding World of Warcraft, you’ll have a blast with this machine. Grab this Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 for only $1,400 while you still can! But if this isn’t quite the machine for you, check out our best gaming laptop picks.
Save $400 on this OLED gaming laptop with RTX 5060 and moreBuy now from Best Buy 
© 2025 PC World 1:35am  
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 review: Mediocre performance meets high price At a glanceExpert's Rating
Pros
Surprising CPU performance
Standard number pad
Cons
Very weak graphics
Drab, glossy display
Big and heavy
No Thunderbolt or USB4
Disappointing battery
Our Verdict
The Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10 just has too little going for it. It’s a functional machine, but that’s the bar a $300 laptop should have to clear. It may have decent CPU performance, but you can also find that on laptops worth owning. This one just has nothing to get excited about except its too-high price tag.
Price When Reviewed
This value will show the geolocated pricing text for product undefined
Best Pricing Today
Best Prices Today: Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1
Retailer
Price
Check
Price comparison from over 24,000 stores worldwide
Product
Price
Price comparison from Backmarket
Best Prices Today: Check today’s prices
Lenovo’s IdeaPad family is a broad one, with all sorts of devices from traditional clamshells, Chromebooks, and 2-in-1s like the Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10 here. But its diversity also makes it hard to anticipate. Some of its laptops can be impressive, but you can’t count on that to mean they all are.
Lenovo suggests this IdeaPad is intended to bring premium features to a more affordable price, but the laptop instead follows in the footsteps of the disappointing IdeaPad Slim 3, offering very little to get excited for and a rather basic all-around experience that begs for the $1,099 list price to get a severe discount.
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10: Specs and features
Model number: F0J20012US
CPU: Intel Core Ultra 7 255U
Memory: 16GB LPDDR5x-8000
Graphics/GPU: Intel Graphics
Display: 16-inch 1200p IPS Touchscreen, glossy
Storage: 512GB PCIe Gen4 SSD
Webcam: 1080p + IR
Connectivity: 2x USB-C 10Gbps with Power Delivery and DisplayPort 1.4 Alternate Mode, 1 HDMI 1.4b, 2x USB-A 5Gbps, 1x microSD card reader, 1x 3.5mm combo audio
Networking: WiFi 6, Bluetooth 5.2
Biometrics: Windows Hello facial recognition
Battery capacity: 57 watt-hours
Dimensions: 14.02 x 10.03 x 0.72 inches
Weight: 4.59 pounds measured
MSRP: $1,099 as-tested ($679 base)
The configuration of the Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10 that was sent over for review is specific to B&H Photo, and it comes with a $1,099 price tag and Intel Core Ultra 7 255U processor, 16GB of memory, and 512GB of storage. This is a pretty sour deal when Lenovo offers the same configuration but with double the storage for an “estimated value” of $1,079, which naturally gets some sort of discount, lowering the price to $829 at the time of writing.
Lenovo offers a lower base configuration that drops the CPU to an Intel Core Ultra 5 225U but leaves everything else unchanged. This lowers the price to an “Est Value” of $919, which had a discount to $689 at the time of writing. Lenovo also offers a configuration that doubles the storage to 1TB while only increasing the “Est Value” by $10, and that model is confusingly just $679 at the time of writing.
You can create a custom configuration, but the options are exceedingly limited. You get to choose from the two CPUs mentioned, 512GB or 1TB of storage, Windows 11 Home or Pro versions, and a Luna Grey or Cosmic Blue color.
While these are the options at the time of writing, it’s possible Lenovo will be expanding them. In its product specifications reference, it mentions the Intel Core Ultra 5 225H and 7 255H CPUs with Intel Arc 130T and Arc 140T graphics, respectively, as well as 32GB of possible memory.
It’s just fumble after fumble, and the only nod to quality Lenovo seems to have made is an aluminum lid.
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10: Design and build quality
IDG / Mark Knapp
The Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10 is about as boring as it gets. The whole thing is a large slab of gray, and even the keyboard is a bland gray. Lenovo opted for a pleasant, aluminum lid, but as large as it is, it certainly could have used some adornment other than Lenovo’s branding. Beyond that lid, the rest of the build is just plastic, and not a particularly impressive-feeling plastic either.
As a 2-in-1, the IdeaPad has Lenovo’s typical hinge design, but it looks awkward in the thick base of the laptop. The hinge is pretty firm, avoiding too much wiggle, but this can make it a little effortful to fold the laptop around into different poses. It’s also so firm that it will lift the bottom of the laptop up when moving it, so no easy one-handed opening.
At a hair over 14 inches wide and 10 inches long, it’s a big machine, and it’s bigger than it needed to be as the 2-in-1 design always seems to entail extra chin bezels below the display. At 4.59 pounds, it’s a hefty machine as well. Lenovo states it is 0.72 inches thick (though I measured it at 0.78 inches and the rubber feet add another tenth of an inch to that), so at least it’s not too big in every dimension.
But still, the system is also simply too large and heavy to use practically as a tablet. I’ve seen HP integrate magnets into its 2-in-1 laptops to keep them folded open in their tablet mode, but the Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10 hasn’t done this, and this sees the two halves flop around a bit in tablet mode.
Lenovo took some, but not full, advantage of the extra space it had. It squeezed a traditional number pad next to the keyboard, albeit with slightly narrow keys. The number pad gets dedicated audio playback controls above it as well. There’s a ton of space above the keyboard as well, and Lenovo has put its speakers there behind a wide grille. Below the keyboard, Lenovo hasn’t been as ambitious. The trackpad is quite small for a machine this size, and it’s centered below the alphanumerics, so it sits very far to the left.
Above the display, Lenovo’s webcam fits into a small extra section of bezel that also houses a physical privacy shutter. When closed, this little lip also makes opening the laptop easier, though still doesn’t sort out the need for a second hand.
Underneath, the Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10 sits on two small rubber feet at the front and a wide foot at the rear. These hold it almost astoundingly securely in place on tables and desks and provide room for air to get in. There’s a wide grille underneath for air intake, though only one fan actually pulls air in. This exhausts out the back edge of the base.
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10: Keyboard, trackpad
IDG / Mark Knapp
The Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10 keyboard is a serious mixed bag. It’s far enough up the laptop to be uncomfortable to reach, with my wrists resting uncomfortably on the front edge. The feel of each key is also very inconsistent. Some feel reasonably well stabilized while others don’t. Some have more of a tactile pop to them as they depress and others just mush down. Those dynamics also shift depending on where on the key you press. The keys aren’t very contoured either.
It’s perhaps just from my experience with Lenovo keyboard over the years that I was still able to reach a typing speed of 115 words per minute with 97 percent accuracy in Monkeytype without much time to adapt, but I can’t say that I was comfortable while I did it. The keys are at least easily legible and get useful backlighting to see in the dark.
The trackpad feels fine. It has a mylar coating that’s plenty smooth, though there’s a bit of friction to the texture. It’s not bad, but it’s not like sliding across ice fresh from the Zamboni. The size of the trackpad is modest, which is plenty for four-finger gestures and a good fit on a 14-inch laptop. But it’s awkwardly small here. I have to reach far across the laptop to use it with my right hand, and often I end up still so far to the right side of the trackpad that my clicks register as right-clicks.
The touchscreen works as an alternative to using the trackpad for everything. I found it reasonably responsive, though it would have felt even more so with a faster refresh rate from the display. The screen is made with glass, and this didn’t prove as smooth to the touch as I’d have hoped.
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10: Display, audio
IDG / Mark Knapp
You get a big display on the Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10. The panel stretches 16 inches from corner to corner, and though its 1920×1200 resolution isn’t exceedingly sharp, it doesn’t look bad at regular viewing distances. But that’s about all the credit the display is going to get. The screen is otherwise very lackluster.
In some ways, it actually exceeds expectations, but only because the expectations were set low. Lenovo rates it for a 300-nit peak brightness and a pitiful 800:1 contrast ratio, but my test sample managed 323.8 nits and a 1,680:1 contrast ratio. That brightness might have been decent on a matte or anti-glare display, but the Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10 has a glossy panel that struggles in bright conditions and will only get worse looking when it’s covered in finger grease — it’s a touchscreen after all.
Then there’s the color. This is one of those bottom-of-the-barrel displays that almost seems to think of color as an afterthought. It achieves just 65 percent coverage of the sRGB colorspace. If you want to see just about anything on your computer the way a creator or web designer intended it, this computer won’t show it to you.
The speakers on the Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10 are also rather pitiful. They don’t sound bad, but they’re wimpy, offering such low volume that even a fan running in the same room will make it a bit hard to hear everything clearly. They’re also lacking in low-end, so you won’t get any oomph in movies or music. Thankfully, they don’t have any awful qualities, like distortion or reverberation with the chassis.
The speakers also work better with the Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10 in its laptop pose, since they’re positioned above the keyboard. When the laptop is in its tent mode — you know, the one ideal for casually watching something — the audio is firing in the wrong direction and sounds even quieter.
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10: Webcam, microphone, biometrics
IDG / Mark Knapp
You won’t be getting the best webcam and mic setup in the world with the Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10. Even though the camera has a 1080p resolution, it won’t do you much good. In dimmer environments, the camera looks dreary and very noisy. Even with a strong light, the video looks oversharpened and not quite lifelike. On the bright side, the camera offers a very wide viewing angle, so you can get other people in the view with you.
The mics aren’t adding much either. They don’t seem to pick up too much background noise, but they also don’t pick up much. In a test recording, my voice sounded thin and a bit far off thanks to ample room echo. Having heard superb noise suppression from the HP OmniBook X Flip 14 recently, it’s all too apparent how far this laptop falls behind.
The webcam at least supports Windows Hello facial recognition, which provides a convenient way to sign in to the computer. It only takes a second or two most of the time.
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10: Connectivity
IDG / Mark Knapp
At first glance, it appears as though the Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10 has done a fine job with its port selection — not amazing for a 16-incher like this, but not bad. And then you discover the specifications of each port, and things go downhill. The Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10 has two USB-C ports on the left side, but these cap out at 10Gbps, not the 20Gbps of USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 or the much faster speeds of USB4 or Thunderbolt 4, both of which have become exceedingly common. There’s an HDMI port on the left edge as well, but it’s an HDMI 1.4 port, which can only support 4K at 30Hz. You can use the USB-C ports for video output, but then you’ll likely be looking for an adapter. The left edge is rounded off with a 3.5mm audio combo jack.
On the right side of the computer, you’ll find a microSD card reader — fine, but there’s definitely room for a full card slot. That sits next to two USB lowly USB-A 5Gbps ports.
You can at least get fast data speeds over Wi-Fi, as the Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10 supports Wi-Fi 6. Even that is beginning to feel a little behind the times, as Wi-Fi 6E can give you faster speeds over a 6GHz band, and Wi-Fi 7 is starting to show up on many more devices. The connection was fast and stable in testing, and it’s likely going to be a few years before Wi-Fi 6 starts to feel like a real shortcoming, but the $1000+ price tag of this system inflates every little shortcoming when its competitors don’t have the same issues.
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10: Performance
The Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10 hasn’t won itself much commendation in any other department, so its hopes bank on its performance. Inside, our test unit is packing a Intel Core Ultra 7 255U, which may not sound like much, but it includes two performance, eight efficiency, and two low-power efficiency cores, racking up a total core count of 12. Unfortunately, that chip doesn’t include the peppy Intel Arc graphics I’ve seen on countless other systems in the past year.
That puts it in a bit of a challenging position. Lenovo’s own Yoga 7i 2-in-1 16ILL10 carries a comparable price tag, similar design, and similar display while swapping its innards for a Intel Core Ultra 7 256V that does include Intel Arc graphics. The Dell Inspiron 16 2-in-1 7640 cost just $1,349 back when it launched over a year ago, and it includes the very capable Intel Core Ultra 7 155H with Intel Arc graphics as well as a brighter 2560×1600 Mini-LED touchscreen. The $1,659 HP OmniBook X Flip 16 shows what it looks like when you go a bit more upscale with the full package. And if you’re not sure a 2-in-1 is necessary, the $1,149 Acer Swift Go 16 demonstrates what you can get from a similarly priced clamshell laptop with its sharp OLED display, higher performance internals, and substantially reduced weight.
The Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10 is slow out of the gate, not doing itself any favors in PCMark 10’s holistic benchmark. This simulates a wide variety of office workloads, and while the Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10 offers respectable performance, it trails every single other system in this group, even the systems with lower-power processors. A crucial issue is the graphical performance of the system, which couldn’t keep up with the Intel Arc graphics on the other systems when it came to digital content creation like photo and video editing.
We can see pretty clearly that it’s not the Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10’s CPU performance holding it back. The Intel Core Ultra 7 255U offers quite respectable speeds, and Lenovo manages to keep it relatively cool. Our Handbrake test tasks the system with encoding a large video file, which takes a lot of CPU horsepower and a long time, giving the system a chance to throttle.
Here we see the Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10 actually beat out last year’s Intel Core Ultra 7 155H by a narrow margin with a lower power envelope and four fewer performance cores, though the Dell system in question did face some thermal throttling. This kind of performance gives the Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10 a leg up on the Yoga 9i and OmniBook X Flip 16, though it still can’t touch the extra performance that the Acer Swift Go 16’s Core Ultra 9 285H brings.
Like Handbrake, Cinebench pushes the CPU, but it provides the opportunity to evaluate both single- and multi-core performance and run bursty and extended tests. In Cinebench R23, we can see that the Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10 actually falls behind Dell’s Inspiron, which doesn’t run into the same throttling issues here as it did in Handbrake. The IdeaPad also continues to lead the Yoga and OmniBook, but it still can’t scratch the Acer Swift Go 16.
Despite this extra horsepower, the actual responsiveness of the system may not always be as impressive as some of these other machines. In Cinebench R23 and R24, the IdeaPad showed that its single-core performance was actually among the slowest of the pack, even falling far behind the Yoga and OmniBook it had otherwise been leading.
While CPU performance was respectable, the Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10 fell hard in the graphics department. The lack of Intel Arc graphics on this chip drags the system down dramatically. It simply can’t keep up with these others, offering about half the performance of all of these alternatives. 3DMark tasks the system with 3D scenes as you might see in video games, the Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10 struggles. Integrated graphics have generally been a poor option, but recent Intel Arc solutions have proven commendable even if they didn’t come close to matching discrete GPUs. The Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10’s basic Intel Graphics, however, is a throwback to how wimpy integrated graphics can be.
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10: Battery life
As big and heavy as the Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10 is, Lenovo didn’t bother to pack in a massive battery. Instead, it has just a 57-watt-hour pack. I have seen bigger batteries in 14-inch laptops. This combines with relatively inefficient performance, and as a result, we see the Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10 only narrowly exceed 12.5 hours in our offline video playback test. We’ve seen some systems exceed 24 hours on new intel chips, and even 20 hours is becoming more common.
An offline video runtime of 12 hours isn’t awful, but with the bar getting pushed so high lately, it’s what I’d call bad on anything other than a gaming laptop. The Yoga and OmniBook may not have offered quite as much CPU performance, but they both hit around 18 hours. Dell’s Inspiron system even narrowly beat the Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10, and it had a higher-wattage CPU and sharper display. This left the Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10 with a victory only over the Acer Swift Go 16, and you can almost forgive that system for only hitting 10 hours when factoring in its better display and how much more powerful, thinner, and lighter it is.
As good as 12.5 hours might sound, offline video playback is something of a best-case scenario. Computers these days play local video very efficiently. Regular office use will suck the battery down much faster. It also doesn’t help that the glossy display more or less requires the screen to run at its highest brightness levels. As a result, I was lucky to see between 6 and 8 hours of runtime — not quite enough to count on safely making it through a workday. At least the 65W charger isn’t too big to easily fit into a bag with the laptop.
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10: Conclusion
The Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16 Gen 10 just feels like it has nothing going for it. Its design is forgettable and doesn’t feel good in the hands (or on the wrists). The display is about as bad as Lenovo can get away with. The ports are several generations behind the times. While the performance looks bright at times, it’s weighed back down by the severely lacking graphics performance. And all that is tied up into a big and heavy machine that doesn’t even pack a long-lasting battery. It’s just fumble after fumble, and the only nod to quality Lenovo seems to have made is an aluminum lid.
At its full price, just don’t buy this laptop. If you need a machine with a big touchscreen that’ll do the basics, maybe consider this one if Lenovo cuts it to $500, and even then, make sure there’s not a better deal on something else first. 
© 2025 PC World 1:15am  
|
|
|
 |
 
|
 Viewsonic VA1655 monitor review: USB-C power comes to a budget portable At a glanceExpert's Rating
Pros
Sharp image with reasonably accurate gamma and color temperature
USB-C with 60 watts power delivery and power pass-through
Good menu system with joystick control
Cons
Thicker and heavier than some alternatives
Modest contrast and color performance
Weak speakers
Our Verdict
The Viewsonic VA1655 has USB-C power with 60 watts of power delivery and supports power pass-through for charging a connected laptop, but it’s thicker than the alternatives, and its image quality doesn’t beat more affordable peers.
Price When Reviewed
This value will show the geolocated pricing text for product undefined
Best Pricing Today
Best Prices Today: Viewsonic VA1655
Retailer
Price
Check
Price comparison from over 24,000 stores worldwide
Product
Price
Price comparison from Backmarket
Best Prices Today: Check today’s prices
Searching for a portable monitor on Amazon can overwhelm you with a torrent of choices from brands you’ve never heard of. That might lead you towards a brand that’s a bit more familiar—like Viewsonic, a brand that’s been in the business for decades. There are advantages to playing it safe with a better-known brand, like superior USB-C connectivity and an easy-to-use menu system, but the VA1655’s image quality doesn’t stand out from the crowd.
Viewsonic VA1655 (15.6-inch) specs and features
The Viewsonic VA1655’s specifications are identical to dozens of other inexpensive portable monitors. It has a 15.6-inch 1080p IPS-LCD display with a refresh rate of 60Hz.
Display size: 15.6-inch 16:9 aspect ratio
Native resolution: 1920×1080
Panel type: IPS LCD
Refresh rate: 60Hz
Adaptive Sync: None
HDR: No
Ports: 1x Mini-HDMI 1.4, 2x USB-C, 3.5mm audio-out
Audio: 2x speakers
Additional features: Carrying case, built-in stand
Price: $109.99 MSRP
The portable monitor’s connectivity is provided by one mini-HDMI port, as well as two USB-C ports. Notably, the USB-C ports both support 60 watts of power delivery, so they can charge and provide video input to the monitor. The monitor also ships with a carrying case.
Read on to learn more, then see our roundup of the best portable monitors for comparison.
Viewsonic VA1655 design
The Viewsonic VA1655’s design is unusual for a budget portable monitor. It doesn’t use a detachable kickstand carrying case but instead integrates the kickstand into the monitor itself.
On the plus side, this means the stand will always be with you. The stand also provides a good range of tilt adjustment with up to roughly 45 degrees of tilt; far better than competitors like the Innoview Portable Monitor, which relies on a kickstand case.
On the downside, the built-in kickstand increases the monitor’s thickness to 0.7 inches and its weight to 1.5 pounds. It’s noticeably thicker and heavier than most competitors that use a kickstand case.
Portability aside, the Viewsonic VA1655’s design reveals its budget price. The exterior is constructed from black plastics that look cheap and feel a bit hollow, and the monitor allows some flex when it’s handled. This is par for the course with budget portable monitors, though, and the VA1655’s thickness means it feels more durable than most.
Because the portable monitor doesn’t have a carrying case with kickstand, it instead ships with a padded sleeve to provide some protection when the monitor is stored. The sleeve works well enough but, like the monitor itself, feels rather cheap.
Matthew Smith / Foundry
Viewsonic VA1655 connectivity
The USB-C ports both support up to 60 watts of power delivery. That’s more than enough to power the monitor, so you don’t need any additional external power source for it. ViewSonic doesn’t ship the monitor with a USB power brick, though, so you’ll need to buy one separately or use one that you have on hand.
The USB-C ports support power pass-through, which means you can connect a USB-C power brick to the portable monitor and then connect the portable monitor to a laptop via USB-C. This will charge the laptop. Power pass-through is a handy feature that budget portable monitors don’t often include.
Unfortunately, the monitor has a mini-HDMI instead of full-sized HDMI. That’s a small disappointment because mini-HDMI is much less common, so adapters and cables that support it are more difficult to find. However, a suitable cable is included in the box.
The USB-C ports support power pass-through — a handy feature that budget portable monitors don’t often include.
Viewsonic VA1655 menus, features, and audio
The VA1655’s menu system is much easier to navigate than most portable monitors thanks to a joystick control tucked around the right-hand side of the display. Most budget portable monitors bundle menu controls into the volume buttons, which is awkward.
The monitor also provides a decent range of image quality settings, including precise gamma presets and custom color modes for RGB calibration. The monitor’s modest image quality sets a limit on how useful these features can be, but it’s another area where the VA1655 beats most competitors.
Matthew Smith / Foundry
Speakers are included, but they’re rated at less than a watt of power each. Their maximum volume is low and bass-heavy tracks will immediately cause distortion. They’re fine for listening to system notification sounds, but not much else.
Viewsonic VA1655 SDR image quality
Priced at roughly $110, the Viewsonic VA1655 is firmly in the budget portable monitor category. With that said, it’s also a long way from the least expensive portable monitor available, as 15.6-inch 1080p alternatives can be found for as little as $60. The VA1655’s higher price unfortunately doesn’t buy you a significant improvement in image quality.
Matthew Smith / Foundry
The Viewsonic VA1655 reached a maximum SDR brightness of 239 nits. That’s fine for most home use, but it’s a long way from the brightest in this category, and it won’t always be enough to keep the display usable while traveling.
The VA1655 also has a semi-gloss display finish. While it partially dampens reflections, a bright light source opposite the display will easily overwhelm the panel.
Matthew Smith / Foundry
Contrast isn’t a perk of the VA1655, though it’s typical for a budget portable monitor. Its maximum contrast ratio of 1110:1 is mid-pack when the VA1655 is placed against similar rivals, like the Arzopa Z1FC and Innoview Portable Monitor.
When compared to OLED alternatives, however, the VA1655 is in far worse shape. OLED portable monitors are more expensive, to be fair, with budget options starting around $200. Still, it’s worth knowing what an extra $100 will get you.
Matthew Smith / Foundry
The VA1655 struggles with color performance. It handles just 67 percent of the sRGB gamut, as well as 50 percent of DCI-P3 and 51 percent of AdobeRGB. That’s similar to other budget portable monitors, but it’s much less than more expensive monitors. The VA1655’s limited color gamut won’t be an issue for most web browsing or working in Microsoft Office, but it will prove a problem if you want to edit photos or videos.
Matthew Smith / Foundry
Viewsonic’s budget monitor is better in color accuracy, but still mid-pack. The monitor’s color accuracy is solid on average and better than the Innoview Portable Monitor. However, it still suffers significant variations in some hues, including cyan and red. These appear muted, with vibrant reds sliding to orange and blues looking faded or pastel.
The VA1655 is better in color temperature and gamma tests. It has a default gamma curve that roughly tracks the target value of 2.2 and a default color temperature of 6700K, which is just a tad cooler than the target of 6500K. The color temperature variance will be noticeable to critical viewers, but it doesn’t immediately stand out.
Sharpness is a perk for the VA1655. 1920×1080 resolution across a 15.6-inch panel works out to about 140 pixels per inch. That’s much sharper than a 27-inch 1440p monitor, though not quite as sharp as a 27-inch 4K display. In any case, the image is clear and crisp.
Viewing angles are decent, too. The VA1655 is easy to view in both the horizontal and vertical planes, though brightness is reduced and color fades if, for example, you stand up and view the monitor from above. However, the VA1655 helps to address even that, as its wide range of adjustment makes it possible to view the display from many angles.
The Viewsonic VA1655’s overall SDR image quality is passable for basic day-to-day productivity. It’s sharp and provides reasonable, though not precise, color accuracy. However, the VA1655’s brightness is towards the low end even for a budget monitor, which might be a problem if you plan to travel with the display.
Viewsonic VA1655 HDR image quality and motion performance
The Viewsonic VA1655 doesn’t support HDR. That might seem disappointing, but budget portable monitors that claim HDR support are, without exception, full of baloney. In this sense, the lack of HDR is a perk. Viewsonic isn’t trying to pull one over on customers.
Motion performance is modest. The monitor has a 60Hz refresh rate, quotes a gray-to-gray pixel response time of 7 milliseconds, and doesn’t support Adaptive Sync. That means 3D games will look blurry in motion, at least when compared to a gaming monitor with a 144Hz refresh rate (or better).
A 60Hz refresh rate is typical at this price, though. Gamers will need to stretch their budget for a portable monitor like the Arzopa Z1FC, which has a 144Hz refresh rate (though even it still lacks Adaptive Sync).
Should you buy the Viewsonic VA1655?
The Viewsonic VA1655 is a passable entry in the highly competitive portable monitor area. It has a few advantages over most budget alternatives like a built-in kickstand, USB-C charging with power pass-through, and a superior menu system. However, those advantages are countered by the VA1655’s bulky design. The monitor’s image quality is modest, too, and matched by less expensive peers. 
© 2025 PC World 2:15am  
|
|
|